Sunday, February 22, 2009

Misunderstood Man

The most intriguing person in A Doll’s House, is not the main character but Nils Krogstad a supporting character. In the first two acts of the play he is the despicable villain who threatens to destroy the Helmer household through the blackmail of Nora. However, in the final act he has a complete change of heart, and gives Nora back her IOU so she can destroy it and the primary conflict of the play is resolved. Why does Krogstad abruptly change and then is never again mentioned in the play? What is Krogstad’s true persona? Is he the despicable villain or a man whose intentions were misunderstood? Initially, there is no sign that Krogstad is anything but an unsavory character. Not only does he attempt to blackmail Nora Helmer in order to keep his job at the bank, but the audience later learns of his moral depravity, committing forgery and cleverly escaping any prosecution.

However, in the second act, the audience is introduced to a slightly different side of Krogstad when threatens Nora a second time. Krogstad actually feels a connection to Nora and pities her because of what she is going through. They both committed forgery, and although Nora did it to save her husband, they situations are still similar. In addition, they both have considered suicide to escape their problems. In this association with Nora the audience is allowed a brief glimpse of a very different person than the evil Krogstad.

Finally in the third Act we are once again shown another side of Krogstad a compassionate side. A declaration of love and trust by Kristine Linde is the catalyst of his change. She tells him, “we two need each other. Nils, I have faith in what, deep down, you are.” With these words, Nils Krogstad finds redemption and tells Kristine “I’ve never been so incredibly happy before.” As a result he sends Nora’s IOU to her husband and he brings the whole sordid affair to an end. Krogstad’s progression from villain to changed man is proof of the power of love.(345)

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I can't agree more with your blog. I think Krogstad is one of the most underrated characters of the play and is perhaps the most realistic of them all. Yes, he is selfish, sometimes criminal, and often seen as the villain, but he is also more realistic than the overly sweet characters of Nora and Torvald.
Great post.

J. Denmark said...

Dear Kendra,
My favorite part of your blog is the wholly unnecessary comma in the first sentence. Besides that, I really liked your exploration of Krogstad. Your final sentence is very deep. It is strange how quickly he undergoes a transformation, and your theory is rather interesting.

Anne Inkpen said...

Hi Kendra :]
I really like how you began your blog by presenting the conflicting questions concerning Krogstad then going on to explain Krogstad's development as a character throughout the play. I agree that his abrupt change of heart is rather odd but I like your explanation of it. Overall, awesome job!

Erin Malone said...

Yes, this is all very true. He is so intriging as a character. I find myself liking him and feeling bad for him in the end. Ur blod is related to one of the questions about whether Krogstad is a pon (pawn sp?) for the plot and ur blog makes me question this even more! Godo job!

Sophie C-K said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sophie C-K said...

AWWWW You and Harry both wrote about Krogstad!

And yay, what a nice post.

Don't pay attention to Jack's post, he is not nice.

Thank you for your well-considered commentary. I liked your analysis of Krogstad, although I think I agree with Harry's take on Krogstad as merely a plot device. I don't know if he is up to all of your careful consideration!

Andrew Seraichick said...

Extremely well written blog Kendra, I agree with your points about Krogstad being misunderstood. In the wider scope of the play he is possibly the most human and compassionate character when juxtaposed with the Helmers. Your ideas were well supported and interesting, well done

Zach Hitchcock said...

Kendra,

Another excellent entry here in the KKK! I really enjoyed how you discussed the softer side of Krogstad and alluded to him being a true compassionate person that has only been marred by corruption and ill-fate for so long that he has trouble expressing that side of himself to people. Although a bit abrupt in the story, I definitely see Krogstad as a man of good that has simply been taken over by evil. Like Anakin.

Great Job,
Zach